Monday, August 13, 2012

FOR PROFIT HIGHER EDUCATION:: Most students don’t graduate

July 30, 2012.
The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) committee, headed by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Ia.), is out with a long promised report on the for-profit college industry


- 1 -
Executive Summary
A 2-year investigation by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions demonstrated that Federal taxpayers are investing billions of dollars a year, $32 billion in the most  recent year, in companies that operate for-profit colleges.  Yet, more than half of the students who  enrolled in in those colleges in 2008-9 left without a degree or diploma within a median of 4 months.
For-profit colleges are owned and operated by businesses.  Like any business, they are ultimately accountable by law for the returns they produce for shareholders.  While small independent for-profit colleges have a long history, by 2009, at least 76 percent of students attending for-profit colleges were  enrolled in a college owned by either a company traded on a major stock exchange or a college owned  by a private equity firm.  The financial performance of these companies is closely tracked by analysts and by investors.
Congress has failed to counterbalance investor demands for increased financial returns with requirements that hold companies accountable to taxpayers for providing quality education, support, and outcomes.  Federal law and regulations currently do not align the incentives of for-profit colleges so that  the colleges succeed financially when students succeed.
For-profit colleges have an important role to play in higher education.  The existing capacity of nonprofit and public higher education is insufficient to satisfy the growing demand for higher education,
particularly in an era of drastic cutbacks in State funding for higher education.  Meanwhile, there has  been an enormous growth in non-traditional students—those who either delayed college, attend parttime or work full-time while enrolled, are independent of their parents, or have dependents other than a
spouse.  This trend has created a “new American majority” of non-traditional students.
In theory, for-profit colleges should be well-equipped to meet the needs of non-traditional students.  They offer the convenience of nearby campus and online locations, a structured approach to coursework and the flexibility to stop and start classes quickly and easily.  These innovations have made attending
college a viable option for many working adults, and have proven successful for hundreds of thousands
of people who might not otherwise have obtained degrees.
But for-profit colleges also ask students with modest financial resources to take a big risk by enrolling in high-tuition schools.  As a result of high tuition, students must take on significant student loan debt to attend school.  When students withdraw, as hundreds of thousands do each year, they are left with high monthly payments but without a commensurate increase in earning power from new training and skills.
Many for-profit colleges fail to make the necessary investments in student support services that have been shown to help students succeed in school and afterwards, a deficiency that undoubtedly contributes to high withdrawal rates.  In 2010, the for-profit colleges examined employed 35,202 recruiters
compared with 3,512 career services staff and 12,452 support services staff, more than two and a half recruiters for each support services employee.
This may help to explain why more than half a million students who enrolled in 2008-9 left without a degree or Certificate by mid-2010.  Among 2-year Associate degree-seekers, 63 percent of students departed without a degree.
The vast majority of the students left with student loan debt that may follow them throughout their lives, and can create a financial burden that is extremely difficult, and sometimes  impossible, to escape.  See more:

No comments:

Post a Comment